Volkswagen and Nissan, as two popular compact cars, occupy a considerable position in the market. However, after in-depth comparison, it is not difficult to find that there are some differences between the two cars. Next, this paper will analyze in detail who is more cost-effective from multiple dimensions.
First of all, from the design point of view, LaVida and Sylphy are both classic and dignified products, focusing on an all-age adaptation. Of course, for young people, both of them are not very trendy, mainly highlighting a stable and stable. The interior is the same. The interior of the two is neither luxurious nor technological, but it is very practical and convenient, and it is also suitable for blind operation. It is still a stable orientation.
However, from the perspective of space, LaVida is a little more spacious, and comfort is the specialty of LaVida, which is much better than LaVida. However, many people say that Sylphy’s seat is too soft and comfortable for a short time, but there is no sense of package and support after sitting for a long time, which makes people feel a bit contradictory.
In terms of chassis, both of them adopt McPherson+torsion beam structure, which is very common in the same class products, which is considered as reactive power, and can’t be compared with the multi-link rear suspension of many independent models. In terms of chassis adjustment, the two cars show completely different temperament, LaVida is full of toughness and sporty feeling, at least in this price range, it is a product with good control, and the effect of filtering vibration is not bad, belonging to a stable and comfortable model. Sylphy is softer than LaVida, and it is a completely comfortable product. As for the control, it can’t be said that there is nothing at all, but it is almost the same as nothing.
As for the power, LaVida is equipped with a low 1.5L natural inhalation and a high 1.5T dry dual clutch. It is not tiring to work with high and low, and this 1.5T combination is really perfect. Those problems are basically gone before. Of course, if the budget is not enough, the power of 1.5L self-priming is really a bit meaty and can only be endured. Sylphy, the fuel version of 1.6L self-priming +CVT is familiar to everyone, and the fuel-saving model +12 seconds Buddha system breaks 100. There is also an electric drive version equipped with a gasoline engine and a motor with considerable torque, which is fuel-efficient and strong. It can be said that it is the best choice for the network car, and it feels good at home. The specific principle is not developed here, which is more complicated. In short, the gasoline engine mainly generates electricity, and then the vehicle is driven by electricity.
In terms of technology configuration, LaVida is slightly higher as a whole, but both sides actually don’t pay much attention to the sense of technology, and the height is not much higher. The main reason is that the high-end models have more intelligent driving related equipment such as adaptive cruise, and the whole is a combination of practical schools.
On the whole, the comprehensive configuration of the Sylphy electric drive version is relatively cost-effective, followed by LaVida. The low allocation of both parties is very simple, mainly for commercial purposes and unit cars, and the home is a bit too stretched.
All in all, in our opinion, the comprehensive cost performance of Sylphy electric drive version is the highest, and it is good to start and stop without endurance anxiety, that is, the price is a bit high, and the top match can be bought. If only the fuel version is considered, the cost performance of LaVida is obviously higher than that of Sylphy, especially the driving experience and configuration of the 1.5T version are very good, and the discount is also very beautiful. However, if you are a drip driver, then Sylphy is definitely more suitable. After all, it is fuel-efficient, comfortable and cheap.